Aggravation phase
Following the conviction, the prosecution was required to
convince the jury that the murder was "cruel,
heinous, or depraved" in order for them to determine that Arias was
eligible for the death penalty. The
aggravation phase of the trial started on May 15, 2013. The
only witness was the medical examiner who performed the autopsy. Arias'
attorneys, who had repeatedly asked to step down from the case, gave only brief
opening statements and closing arguments, in which they said the adrenaline
rushing through Alexander's body may have prevented him from feeling much pain
during his death. Prosecutor Martinez showed photos of the corpse and crime
scene to the jury and then paused for two minutes of silence to illustrate how
long he said it took for Alexander to die at Arias' hands. After less than
three hours of consideration, the jury determined that Arias was eligible for
the death penalty.
Penalty phase
The penalty phase began on May 16, 2013, when prosecutors
called Alexander's family members to offer victim impact statements, in an
effort to convince the jury that Arias' crime merited a death sentence.
On May 21, Arias offered an allocution, during which she
pleaded for a life sentence. Arias acknowledged that her plea for life was a
reversal of remarks she made to a TV reporter shortly after her conviction
when she said she preferred the death penalty. "Each time I said that I meant it, but I lacked
perspective," she said.
"Until very recently, I could not imagine standing before you and asking
you to give me life." She said she changed her mind to avoid bringing
more pain to members of her family, who were in the courtroom. At one point,
she held up a white T-shirt with the word "survivor"
written across it, telling the jurors that she would sell the clothing and
donate all proceeds to victims of domestic abuse. She also said she would
donate her hair to Locks of Love
while in prison, and had already done so three times while in jail.
That evening, in a joint jailhouse interview with The Arizona Republic, KPNX-TV and NBC's Today, Arias said she did not know whether the jury would
come back with life or death. "Whatever
they come back with I will have to deal with it, I have no other choice." Regarding
the verdict, she said, "It felt like
a huge sense of unreality. I felt betrayed, actually, by the jury. I was hoping
they would see things for what they are. I felt really awful for my family and
what they were thinking."
On May 23, the sentencing phase of Arias' trial resulted in
a hung jury, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial for that phase. The jury
had reached an 8–4 decision in favor of the death penalty. After the jury was discharged, the jury foreman
Zervakos stated that the jury found the responsibility of weighing the death
sentence overwhelming, but was horrified when their efforts ended in a
mistrial. "By the end of it, we were
mentally and emotionally exhausted," he said. "I think we were horrified when we found out that they had
actually called a mistrial, and we felt like we had failed."
On May 30, Maricopa
County Attorney Bill Montgomery discussed the next steps at a news
conference. He said he was confident an impartial jury could be seated, but it
was possible that lawyers and the victim's family could agree to scrap the
trial in favor of a life sentence with no parole. Arias had said, "I don't think there is an untainted jury pool anywhere in the
world right now. That's what it feels like. But I still believe in the system
to a degree, so we'll just go through that if that happens." Defense attorneys responded, "If the diagnosis made by the State's
psychologist is correct, the Maricopa County Attorney's Office is seeking to
impose the death penalty upon a mentally ill woman who has no prior criminal
history. It is not incumbent upon Ms. Arias' defense counsel to resolve this
case."
Appeals
During the trial, defense attorneys filed for mistrial in
January, April and May 2013. Arias'
lawyers argued in January that Esteban
Flores, the lead Mesa police
detective on the case, perjured himself during a 2008 pretrial hearing aimed at
determining whether the death penalty should be considered an option for
jurors. Flores testified at the 2009 hearing that based on his own review of
the scene and a discussion with the medical examiner, it was apparent that
Alexander had been shot in the forehead first. Contrary to Flores' testimony at
the 2009 hearing, the medical examiner told jurors the gunshot probably would
have incapacitated Alexander. Given his extensive defense wounds, including
stab marks and slashes to his hands, arms, and legs, it was not likely the shot
came first. Flores denied perjury and said during his trial testimony that he
just misunderstood what the medical examiner told him.
In April, the defense claimed the prosecutor had acted
inappropriately and said the case resembled a modern-day equivalent to the Salem witch trials. In the motion, the
defense team contended "the
prosecutorial misconduct has infested these proceedings with a level of
unfairness that cannot be cured by any other means." The motion also
stated there is a "circus-like
atmosphere inside the courtroom" and that Martinez had yelled at
witnesses, attacked witnesses on a personal level and had thrown evidence. The
motion also alleged that Martinez chose to release evidence and to pose for
pictures with his fans on the steps of the courthouse. The attorneys claimed
Arias was in a position in which she could not present a complete defense and
that the only constitutional course was to declare a mistrial.
On May 20, 2013, defense attorneys filed a motion which
alleged that a defense witness who had been due to testify the preceding
Friday, the 17th, began receiving death threats for her scheduled testimony on
Arias' behalf. The day before the filing, the witness contacted counsel for
Arias, stating that she was no longer willing to testify because of the
threats. The motion continued, "It
should also be noted that these threats follow those made to Alyce LaViolette,
a record of which was made ex-parte and under seal." The motion was
denied, as was a motion for a stay in the proceedings that had been sought to
give time to appeal the decisions to the Arizona
Supreme Court.
On May 29, 2013, the Arizona
Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal filed three months earlier, also
refused by the mid-level Arizona Court
of Appeals. Nurmi had asked the high court to throw out the aggravating
factor of cruelty because the judge had allowed it to go forward based on a
different theory of how the murder occurred. The lead detective originally
claimed that the gunshot occurred first, followed by the stabbing and slitting
of the throat. Based on that theory, Stephens ruled there was probable cause to
find the crime had been committed in an especially cruel manner, an aggravating
factor under state law. Subsequent to this initial hearing, the medical
examiner testified that the gunshot occurred postmortem.
On July 6, 2018, Arias' current attorneys, Margaret M. Green (a.k.a. Peg Green) and Corey Engle, filed a 324-page appeal seeking her murder conviction
be overturned to the Court of Appeals.
The state's response was due by January 4, 2019, and is to be provided by the Arizona Attorney General's Office. Arias
would be allowed a formal reply to the state's counterargument prior to the
case going before a three-judge panel for oral argument.
On October 17, 2019, Arias' attorneys argued to the Court of Appeals that her sentence
should be overturned on the basis that Martinez acted inappropriately
throughout the trial, resulting in a media frenzy and affecting the outcome of
the trial.
Sentencing retrial
and incarceration
On October 21, 2014, Arias' sentencing retrial began.
Opening statements were given, and a hearing on evidence was held. Prosecution
witness Amanda Webb, called in the
first trial to rebut Arias' testimony that she returned a gas can to Walmart on May 8, 2007, admitted she did
not know if all records were transferred after the store relocated. After a holiday break, the retrial resumed in
January 2015. Mesa police experts admitted that Alexander's laptop had viruses
and pornography, contrary to testimony in the first trial in 2013. Jury deliberations began on February 12, 2015.
On March 2, 2015, the jury informed
Judge Stephens that they were deadlocked. Arias' attorneys requested a
mistrial. Stephens denied the request, read additional instructions to the
jury, and ordered them to resume deliberations. On March 5, 2015, Stephens declared a mistrial
because the jurors, who deliberated for about 26 hours over five days,
deadlocked at 11–1 vote in favor of the death penalty. Sentencing was scheduled
for April 7, 2015, with Stephens having the option to sentence Arias to either
life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, or with the possibility of
parole after 25 years. On April 13,
Stephens sentenced Arias to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
By March 5, 2015, Arias' trials cost an
estimated $3 million.
In an interview on April 8, 2015, Arias' attorney Jennifer Willmott discussed the social
media furor, death threats she received, Arias' statements at the sentencing,
the holdout juror, and stated that she believed that Arias testified
truthfully.
In June 2015, following a restitution hearing, Arias was
ordered to pay more than $32,000 to Alexander's siblings. Her attorney stated
this was about one-third of the amount requested.
As of 2016, Arias is housed at the Arizona Department of Corrections #281129, which is located at Arizona State Prison Complex - Perryville. She started her sentence in the complex's
maximum security Lumley Unit, but she
has the possibility of being downgraded to the medium-security level.
Media
The Associated Press
reported that the public would be able to watch testimony in the Jodi Arias
trial. This decision by a three-judge
panel of the Arizona Court of Appeals
overruled Maricopa County Superior Court
Judge Sherry Stephens' decision to "allow
a witness to testify in private as jurors [weighed] whether to give [Arias] the
death penalty." Judge Stephens
held secret (non-public) hearings. As a result of the move for secrecy, an
unidentified defense witness was allowed to testify in private. Though Judge
Stephens' decision was overruled, "the
mystery witness who testified...at the start of the defense case" wasn't
revealed to the public.
The case featured on an episode of 48 Hours Mystery: Picture Perfect in 2008, an interview which, for
the first time in the history of 48
Hours was used as evidence in a death penalty trial. On September 24, 2008, Inside Edition interviewed Arias at the Maricopa County Jail where she stated, "No jury is going to convict me...because I am innocent and you
can mark my words on that. No jury is going to convict me."
The Associated Press
said the case was a "circus,"
a "runaway train" and said
the case "grew into a worldwide
sensation as thousands followed the trial via a live, unedited Web feed."
They added that the trial garnered "daily coverage from cable news
networks and spawned a virtual cottage industry for talk shows" and at
the courthouse, "the entire case devolved
into a circus-like spectacle attracting dozens of enthusiasts each day to the
courthouse as they lined up for a chance to score just a few open public seats
in the gallery;" "For its fans, the Arias trial became a live daytime
soap opera." The Toronto Star stated, "With its mix of jealousy, religion,
murder, and sex, the Jodi Arias case
shows what happens when the justice system becomes entertainment."
During the trial, public figures freely expressed their
opinions. "Jodi Arias has stated
that she follows me on Twitter so I really hate to be saying that she is guilty
but sadly, she is as guilty as it gets," Donald Trump wrote. He also commented on how the Government should
avoid leniency. "Jodi should try but
the govt. should not make a deal – no jury could be dumb enough to let her off
(but you never know, look at OJ & others)," Trump suggested. Arizona
Governor Jan Brewer told reporters after an unrelated press event that she
believed Arias to be guilty. She sidestepped a question about whether she
believed Arias was guilty of manslaughter, second-degree murder or first-degree
murder, but said, "I don't have all
the information, but I think she's guilty."
HLN staff and
their commentators compared the case to the Casey Anthony case for the perceived similarities between Anthony
and Arias and the emotions that the cases incited in the general public. Additionally, HLN aired a daily show covering the trial called HLN After Dark: The Jodi Arias Trial. The cable network sent out a press release
titled "HLN No. 1 Among Ad-Supported
Cable as Arias Pleads for Her Life," bragging that they led in the
ratings. The release stated: "HLN
continues to be the ratings leader and complete source for coverage of the Jodi
Arias Trial. On May 21, HLN ranked No.1 among ad-supported cable networks from
1:56p to 2:15p (ET) as Arias took the stand to plead for her life in front of
the jury that found her guilty of Alexander's murder. During that time period,
HLN out-delivered the competition among both total viewers (2,540,000) and
25–54 demo viewers (691,000). HLN also ranked No.1 among ad-supported cable
networks for the 2p hour delivering 2,227,000 total viewers and 620,000 25–54
viewers."
Jodi Arias: Dirty
Little Secret, a made-for-television movie, stars Lost actress Tania Raymonde
as Arias and Jesse Lee Soffer, of The Mob
Doctor and Chicago P.D., as Alexander. Prosecutor Juan Martinez was
played by Ugly Betty actor Tony Plana and David Zayas, of Dexter,
portrays detective Esteban Flores. Created for and distributed by the Lifetime Network, the film premiered
June 22, 2013.
Former detective for Siskiyou
County, California, who arrested Arias at her grandparents' home after it
appeared she was on the move, is coming forward. He discusses his involvement
in the explosive investigation and trial in the three-part limited series, that
aired mid-January 2018, on Investigation
Discovery (ID) titled "Jodi
Arias: An American Murder Mystery." The special explores the death of Alexander
and the subsequent legal circus as Arias was tried.
The pilot episode of Murder
Made Me Famous, which aired 15 August 2015, chronicled the case.
Social media
In late January 2013, artwork drawn by Arias began selling
on eBay. The seller was her brother;
he claimed that the profits went towards covering the family's travel expenses
to the trial and "better food"
for Arias while she was in jail.
On April 11, USA Today
reported that during the testimony of defense witness Alyce LaViolette, public outrage was extreme concerning her
assertions that Arias was a victim of domestic violence. Tweets and other
social media posts attacked LaViolette's reputation. More than 500 negative
reviews of LaViolette's yet-to-be-released book appeared on Amazon.com calling LaViolette a fraud
and a disgrace. "It's the electronic
version of a lynch mob," said retired Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Kenneth Fields. Attorney
Anne Bremner, who said she received death threats after she provided legal
counsel in the Amanda Knox case,
told The Huffington Post that the
kind of online ridicule and threats LaViolette received could affect attorneys
and witnesses in high-profile trials. "It's
something to take into account," Bremner said. "If I had kids I would consider it even more so."
On May 9, The Republic
commented: "The Jodi Arias trial has been a social-media magnet. And when Arias was
convicted Wednesday of first-degree murder, Twitter and Facebook exploded with
reaction. Much of it was aimed at Arias, though plenty of people tweeted at the
media coverage, such as the antics of HLN host Nancy Grace. During the trial, hardcore followers of the
proceedings were accused of trying to use social media to intimidate witnesses
or otherwise influence the outcome. Whether it had any effect is questionable,
but it's a notable development."
On May 24, Victoria Washington,
who was one of Arias' attorneys until she had to resign in 2011 because of a
conflict said "Arias' lead
attorney, Nurmi, was pilloried in social media. At one point, an Internet
denizen digitally superimposed his face onto a crime-scene photo of Alexander
dead in the shower of his Mesa home.
I know people were aggravated with him constantly filing for a mistrial, but you
have to make and preserve the record for federal review (on appeal). If you
don't file for a mistrial, the appeals courts will say you waived it."
On May 28, Radar
Online reported the jury foreman had been receiving threats ever since the
panel deadlocked on the sentencing phase, and now his son was claiming he's
receiving death threats. "Today I
read hate mail my dad had gotten. Some person had sent him a threatening
message complete with his email address, full name, and phone number (which at
the very least means that this guy should retake Hate Mail 101). I also read
some comments on an article online about my dad. Surreal. They say my dad was
fooled by the defendant, which he was taken with her, that he hated the
prosecutor," his son wrote on his public blog.
The Twitter
account in Arias' name is operated by Arias' friends on her behalf. On June 22,
from that account, Arias tweeted, "Just
don't know yet if I will plea or appeal."
On March 6, 2015, after the retrial of the penalty phase
concluded, it was reported that juror #17,
the sole holdout, received death threats and police were posted at her house. Dennis Elias, a jury consultant, said, "The very fact that people are making
death threats and trying to out her, it is not a proud day for any single one
of those people and they should be ashamed."
No comments:
Post a Comment