The New World Order (NWO) is a conspiracy theory that hypothesizes a secretly emerging totalitarian world government. The common theme in conspiracy theories about a New World Order is that a secretive power elite with a globalist agenda is conspiring to eventually achieve world domination and rule the world through an authoritarian one-world government—which will replace sovereign nation-states—and an all-encompassing propaganda whose ideology hails the establishment of the New World Order as the culmination of history's progress. Many influential historical and contemporary figures have therefore been alleged to be part of a cabal that operates through many front organizations to orchestrate significant political and financial events, ranging from causing systemic crises to pushing through controversial policies, at both national and international levels, as steps in an ongoing plot to achieve world domination.
Before the early 1990s, New World Order conspiracism was
limited to two American countercultures, primarily the militantly
anti-government right, and secondarily the part of fundamentalist Christianity
concerned with the eschatological end-time emergence of the Antichrist.
Academics who study conspiracy theories and religious extremism, such as
Michael Barkun and Chip Berlet, observed that right-wing populist conspiracy
theories about a New World Order not only had been embraced by many seekers of
stigmatized knowledge but also had seeped into popular culture, thereby fueling
a surge of interest and participation in survivalism and paramilitarism as many
people actively prepare for apocalyptic and millenarian scenarios. These
political scientists warn that mass hysteria over New World Order conspiracy
theories could eventually have devastating effects on American political life,
ranging from escalating lone-wolf terrorism to the rise to power of
authoritarian ultranationalist demagogues.
History of the term
General usage
(pre-Cold War)
During the 20th century, political figures such as Woodrow
Wilson and Winston Churchill used the term "new
world order" to refer to a new period of history characterized by a
dramatic change in world political thought and in the global balance of power
after World War I and World War II. The interwar and post-World War II periods
were seen as opportunities to implement idealistic proposals for global
governance through collective efforts to address worldwide problems that go beyond
the capacity of individual nation-states to resolve, while nevertheless
respecting the right of nations to self-determination. Such collective
initiatives manifested in the formation of intergovernmental organizations such
as the League of Nations in 1920, the United Nations (UN) in 1945, and the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1949, along with international
regimes such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade (GATT), implemented to maintain a cooperative balance of power and
facilitate reconciliation between nations to prevent the prospect of another
global conflict. These cosmopolitan efforts to instill liberal internationalism
were regularly criticized and opposed by American paleoconservative business
nationalists from the 1930s on.
Progressives welcomed international organizations and
regimes such as the United Nations in the aftermath of the two World Wars but
argued that these initiatives suffered from a democratic deficit and were
therefore inadequate not only to prevent another world war but to foster global
justice, as the UN was chartered to be a free association of sovereign
nation-states rather than a transition to democratic world government. Thus,
cosmopolitan activists around the globe, perceiving the IGOs as too ineffectual
for global change, formed a world-federalist movement.
British writer and futurist H. G. Wells went further than
progressives in the 1940s, by appropriating and redefining the term "new world order" as a synonym
for the establishment of a technocratic world state and of a planned economy,
garnering popularity in state socialist circles.
Usage as a reference to
a conspiracy (Cold War era)
During the Second Red Scare, both secular and Christian
right American agitators, largely influenced by the work of Canadian conspiracy
theorist William Guy Carr increasingly embraced and spread dubious fears of
Freemasons, Illuminati, and Jews as the alleged driving forces behind an "international communist
conspiracy." The threat of "Godless
communism", in the form of an atheistic, bureaucratic collectivist
world government, demonized as the "Red
Menace", became the focus of apocalyptic millenarian conspiracism. The
Red Scare came to shape one of the core ideas of the political right in the
United States, which is that liberals and progressives, with their
welfare-state policies and international cooperation programs such as foreign
aid, supposedly contribute to a gradual process of global collectivism that
will inevitably lead to nations being replaced with a communistic/collectivist
one-world government. James Warburg, appearing before the United States Senate
Committee on Foreign Relations in 1950, famously stated: "We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The
question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by
conquest."
Right-wing populist advocacy groups with a paleoconservative
world-view, such as the John Birch Society, disseminated a multitude of
conspiracy theories in the 1960s claiming that the governments of both the
United States and the Soviet Union were controlled by a cabal of corporate
internationalists, "greedy"
bankers and corrupt politicians who were intent on using the UN as the vehicle
to create a "One World
Government". This anti-globalist conspiracism fueled the campaign for
U.S. withdrawal from the UN. American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966
booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy
to the establishment of the U.S. Federal Reserve in 1913 by international
bankers, whom she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921
as a shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, many readers
would have interpreted "international
bankers" as a reference to a postulated "international Jewish banking conspiracy" masterminded by
the Rothschild family.
Arguing that the term "New
World Order" is used by a secretive global elite dedicated to the
eradication of the sovereignty of the world's nations, American writer Gary
Allen—in his books None Dare Call It Conspiracy (1971), Rockefeller:
Campaigning for the New World Order (1974), and Say "No!" to the New World Order (1987)—articulated the
anti-globalist theme of contemporary right-wing conspiracism in the U.S. After
the fall of communism in the early 1990s, the de facto subject of New World
Order conspiracism shifted from crypto-communists, perceived to be plotting to
establish an atheistic world communist government, to globalists, perceived to
be plotting to implement a collectivist generally, unified world government
ultimately controlled by an untouchable oligarchy of international bankers,
corrupt politicians, and corporatists, or the United Nations itself. The shift
in perception was inspired by growing opposition to corporate internationalism
on the American right in the 1990s.
In his speech, Toward a New World Order, delivered on 11
September 1990 during a joint session of the US Congress, President George H.
W. Bush described his objectives for post-Cold War global governance in
cooperation with post-Soviet states. He stated:
Until now, the world we've
known has been a world divided—a world of barbed wire and concrete block,
conflict, and the Cold War. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A
world in which there is the genuine prospect of a new world order. In the words
of Winston Churchill, a "world order" in which "the principles
of justice and fair play ... protect the weak against the strong ..." A
world where the United Nations, freed from Cold War stalemate, is poised to
fulfill the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and
respect for human rights find a home among all nations.
The New York Times observed that progressives were
denouncing this new world order as a rationalization of American imperial
ambitions in the Middle East at the time. At the same time, conservatives
rejected any new security arrangements altogether and fulminated about any possibility
of a UN revival. Chip Berlet, an American investigative reporter specializing
in the study of right-wing movements in the U.S., wrote that the Christian and
secular far-right were especially terrified by Bush's speech. Fundamentalist
Christian groups interpreted Bush's words as signaling the End Times. At the
same time, more secular theorists approached it from an anti-communist and
anti-collectivist standpoint and feared hegemony over all countries by the
United Nations.
Post–Cold War usage
American televangelist Pat Robertson, with his 1991
best-selling book The New World Order, became the most prominent Christian
disseminator of conspiracy theories about recent American history. He describes
a scenario where Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, the Council on
Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral Commission control
the flow of events from behind the scenes, constantly nudging people covertly
in the direction of world government for the Antichrist.
It has been observed that, throughout the 1990s, the
galvanizing language used by conspiracy theorists such as Linda Thompson, Mark
Koernke, and Robert K. Spear led to militancy and the rise of the American
militia movement. The militia movement's anti-government ideology was spread
through speeches at rallies and meetings, books and videotapes sold at gun
shows, shortwave and satellite radio, fax networks, and computer bulletin boards.
It has been argued that it was overnight AM radio shows and propagandistic
viral content on the internet that most effectively contributed to more
extremist responses to the perceived threat of the New World Order. This led to
the substantial growth of New World Order conspiracism, with it retroactively
finding its way into the previously apolitical literature of numerous Kennedy
assassinologists, ufologists, lost land theorists and—partially inspired by
fears surrounding the "Satanic
panic"—occultists. From the mid-1990s onward, the amorphous appeal of
those subcultures transmitted New World Order conspiracism to a larger audience
of seekers of stigmatized knowledge, with the common characteristic of
disillusionment of political efficacy.
From the mid-1990s to the early 2000s, Hollywood
conspiracy-thriller television shows and films also played a role in
introducing a general audience to various fringe, esoteric theories related to
New World Order conspiracism—which by that point had developed to include black
helicopters, FEMA "concentration
camps", etc.—theories which for decades previously were confined to
largely right-wing subcultures. The 1993–2002 television series The X-Files,
the 1997 film Conspiracy Theory, and the 1998 film The X-Files: Fight the Future
are often cited as notable examples.
Following the start of the 21st century, and specifically
during the late-2000s financial crisis, many politicians and pundits, such as
Gordon Brown and Henry Kissinger, used the term "new world order" in their advocacy for a comprehensive
reform of the global financial system and their calls for a "New Bretton Woods" taking
into account emerging markets such as China and India. These public
declarations reinvigorated New World Order conspiracism, culminating in
talk-show host Sean Hannity stating on his Fox News program Hannity that the "conspiracy theorists were right".
Progressive media watchdog groups have repeatedly criticized Fox News in
general, and its now-defunct opinion show Glenn Beck in particular, for not
only disseminating New World Order conspiracy theories to mainstream audiences but possibly agitating so-called "lone
wolf" extremism, particularly from the radical right.
In 2009, American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel
released New World Order, a critically acclaimed documentary film that
explores the world of conspiracy theorists—such as American radio host Alex
Jones—who vigorously oppose what they perceive as an emerging New World Order.
The growing dissemination and popularity of conspiracy theories has also
created an alliance between right-wing agitators and hip hop music's left-wing
rappers (such as KRS-One, Professor Griff of Public Enemy, and Immortal
Technique), illustrating how anti-elitist conspiracism can create unlikely
political allies in efforts to oppose a political system.
Conspiracy theories
There are numerous systemic conspiracy theories through
which the concept of a New World Order is viewed. The following is a list of
the major ones in roughly chronological order:
End time
John Nelson Darby
Since the 19th century, many apocalyptic millennial
Christian eschatologists, starting with John Nelson Darby, have predicted a
globalist conspiracy to impose a tyrannical New World Order governing structure
as the fulfillment of prophecies about the "end
time" in the Bible, specifically in the Book of Ezekiel, the Book of
Daniel, the Olivet discourse found in the Synoptic Gospels, 2 Esdras 11:32 and
Revelation 13:7. They claim that people who have made a deal with the Devil to
gain wealth and power have become pawns in a supernatural chess game to move
humanity into accepting a utopian world government that rests on the spiritual
foundations of a syncretic-messianic world religion, which will later reveal
itself to be a dystopian world empire that imposes the imperial cult of an “Unholy Trinity” of Satan, the
Antichrist and the False Prophet.[citation needed] In many contemporary
Christian conspiracy theories, the False Prophet will be either the last pope
of the Catholic Church (groomed and installed by an Alta Vendita or Jesuit
conspiracy), a guru from the New Age movement, or even the leader of an elite
fundamentalist Christian organization like the Fellowship, while the Antichrist
will be either the President of the European Union, the Caliph of a pan-Islamic
state, or even the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Some of the most vocal critics of end-time conspiracy
theories come from within Christianity. In 1993, historian Bruce Barron wrote a
stern rebuke of apocalyptic Christian conspiracism in the Christian Research
Journal, when reviewing Robertson's 1991 book The New World Order. Another
critique can be found in historian Gregory S. Camp's 1997 book Selling Fear:
Conspiracy Theories and End-Times Paranoia. Religious studies scholar Richard
T. Hughes argues that "New World
Order" rhetoric libels the Christian faith since the "New World Order" as defined
by Christian conspiracy theorists has no basis in the Bible whatsoever.
Furthermore, he argues that not only is this idea unbiblical, but it is posbut itively
anti-biblical and fundamentally anti-Christian because by misinterpreting key
passages in the Book of Revelation, it turns a comforting message about the
coming kingdom of God into one of fear, panic and despair in the face of an
allegedly approaching one-world government. Progressive Christians, such as
preacher-theologian Peter J. Gomes, caution Christian fundamentalists that a "spirit of fear" can distort
scripture and history through dangerously combining biblical literalism,
apocalyptic timetables, demonization, and oppressive prejudices, while Camp
warns of the "very real danger that
Christians could pick up some extra spiritual baggage" by credulously
embracing conspiracy theories. They therefore call on Christians who indulge in
conspiracism to repent.
Freemasonry
Freemasonry is one of the world's oldest secular fraternal
organizations and arose in Great Britain during the 18th century. Over the
years, several allegations and conspiracy theories have been directed towards
Freemasonry, including the allegation that Freemasons have a hidden political
agenda and are conspiring to bring about a New World Order, a world government
organized according to Masonic principles or governed only by Freemasons.
The esoteric nature of Masonic symbolism and rites led to
Freemasons first being accused of secretly practicing Satanism in the late 18th
century. The original allegation of a conspiracy within Freemasonry to subvert
religions and governments to take over the world traces back to Scottish author
John Robison, whose reactionary conspiracy theories crossed the Atlantic and
influenced outbreaks of Protestant anti-Masonry in the United States during the
19th century. In the 1890s, French writer Léo Taxil wrote a series of pamphlets
and books denouncing Freemasonry and charging their lodges with worshiping
Lucifer as the Supreme Being and Great Architect of the Universe. Even though Taxil admitted that his claims were all a hoax, they were and still
are believed and repeated by numerous conspiracy theorists and had a huge
influence on subsequent anti-Masonic claims about Freemasonry.
Some conspiracy theorists eventually speculated that some
Founding Fathers of the United States, such as George Washington and Benjamin
Franklin, were having Masonic sacred geometric designs interwoven into American
society, particularly in the Great Seal of the United States, the United States
one-dollar bill, the architecture of National Mall landmarks and the streets
and highways of Washington, D.C., as part of a master plan to create the first "Masonic government" as a
model for the coming New World Order.
A Masonic Lodge room
Freemasons rebut these claims of a Masonic conspiracy.
Freemasonry, which promotes rationalism, places no power on occult symbols
themselves, and it is not a part of its principles to view the drawing of
symbols, no matter how large, as an act of consolidating or controlling power.
Furthermore, there is no published information establishing the Masonic
membership of the men responsible for the design of the Great Seal. While
conspiracy theorists assert that there are elements of Masonic influence on the
Great Seal of the United States and that these elements were intentionally or
unintentionally used because the creators were familiar with the symbols, in
fact, the all-seeing Eye of Providence and the unfinished pyramid were symbols
used as much outside Masonic lodges as within them in the late 18th century.
Therefore, the designers were drawing from common esoteric symbols. The Latin
phrase "novus ordo seclorum",
appearing on the reverse side of the Great Seal since 1782 and the back of the
one-dollar bill since 1935, translates to "New
Order of the Ages", and alludes to the beginning of an era where the
United States of America is an independent nation-state; conspiracy theorists
often mistranslate it as "New World
Order".
Although the European continental branch of Freemasonry has
organizations that allow political discussion within their Masonic Lodges,
Masonic researcher Trevor W. McKeown argues that the accusations ignore several
facts. Firstly, the many Grand Lodges are independent and sovereign, meaning
they act independently and do not have a common agenda. The points of belief of
the various lodges often differ. Secondly, famous Freemasons have always held
views that span the political spectrum and show no particular pattern or
preference. As such, the term "Masonic
government" is erroneous; there is no consensus among Freemasons about
what an ideal government would look like.
Illuminati
The Order of the Illuminati was an Enlightenment-age secret
society founded by university professor Adam Weishaupt on 1 May 1776, in Upper
Bavaria, Germany. The movement consisted of advocates of freethought,
secularism, liberalism, republicanism, and gender equality, recruited from the
German Masonic Lodges, who sought to teach rationalism through mystery schools.
In 1785, the order was infiltrated, broken up, and suppressed by the government
agents of Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria, in his preemptive campaign to
neutralize the threat of secret societies ever becoming hotbeds of conspiracies
to overthrow the Bavarian monarchy and its state religion, Roman Catholicism.
There is no evidence that the Bavarian Illuminati survived its suppression in
1785.
In the late 18th century, reactionary conspiracy theorists,
such as Scottish physicist John Robison and French Jesuit priest Augustin
Barruel, began speculating that the Illuminati had survived their suppression
and become the masterminds behind the French Revolution and the Reign of
Terror. The Illuminati were accused of being subversives who were attempting to
secretly orchestrate a revolutionary wave in Europe and the rest of the world
by spreading the most radical ideas and movements of the
Enlightenment—anti-clericalism, anti-monarchism, and anti-patriarchalism— which
the accusers feared would lead to the destruction of the natural order of
things. During the 19th century, fear of an Illuminati conspiracy was a real concern
of the European ruling classes, and their oppressive reactions to this
unfounded fear provoked in 1848 the very revolutions they sought to prevent.
During the interwar period of the 20th century, fascist
propagandists, such as British revisionist historian Nesta Helen Webster and
American socialite Edith Starr Miller, not only popularized the myth of an
Illuminati conspiracy but claimed that it was a subversive secret society that
served the Jewish elites that supposedly propped up both finance capitalism and
Soviet communism to divide and rule the world. American evangelist
Gerald Burton Winrod and other conspiracy theorists within the fundamentalist
Christian movement in the United States—which emerged in the 1910s as a
backlash against the principles of Enlightenment secular humanism, modernism,
and liberalism—became the main channel of dissemination of Illuminati
conspiracy theories in the U.S. Right-wing populists, such as members of the
John Birch Society, subsequently began speculating that some collegiate
fraternities (Skull and Bones), gentlemen's clubs (Bohemian Club), and think
tanks (Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission) of the American
upper class are front organizations of the Illuminati, which they accuse of
plotting to create a New World Order through a one-world government. The
Illuminatus! Trilogy, a series of three satirical novels by American writers
Robert Shea and Robert Anton Wilson, first published in 1975, which attributed
the alleged major cover-ups of the era – such as who shot John F. Kennedy – to
the Illuminati, was extremely influential in popularizing the myth of an
Illuminati super-conspiracy during the 1960s and onward.
The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an anti-Semitic
canard, originally published in Russian in 1903, alleging a Judeo-Masonic
conspiracy to achieve world domination. The text purports to be the minutes of
the secret meetings of a cabal of Jewish masterminds, which has co-opted Freemasonry
and is plotting to rule the world on behalf of all Jews because they believe
themselves to be the chosen people of God. The Protocols incorporate many of
the core conspiracist themes outlined in the Robison and Barruel attacks on the
Freemasons and overlay them with anti-Semitic allegations about anti-Tsarist
movements in Russia. The Protocols reflect themes similar to more general
critiques of Enlightenment liberalism by conservative aristocrats who support
monarchies and state religions. The interpretation intended by the publication
of The Protocols is that if one peels away the layers of the Masonic
conspiracy, past the Illuminati, one finds the rotten Jewish core.
Cover of a 1920 copy
of The Jewish Peril
Numerous polemicists, such as Irish journalist Philip Graves
in a 1921 article in The Times, and British academic Norman Cohn in his 1967
book Warrant for Genocide, have proven The Protocols to be both a hoax and a
clear case of plagiarism. There is general agreement that Russian-French writer
and political activist Matvei Golovinski fabricated the text for Okhrana, the
secret police of the Russian Empire, as a work of counter-revolutionary
propaganda before the 1905 Russian Revolution, by plagiarizing, almost word
for word in some passages, from The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and
Montesquieu, a 19th-century satire against Napoleon III of France written by
French political satirist and Legitimist militant Maurice Joly.
Responsible for feeding many anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic
mass hysterias of the 20th century, The Protocols has been influential in the
development of some conspiracy theories, including some New World Order
theories, and repeatedly appears in certain contemporary conspiracy literature.
For example, the authors of the 1982 controversial book The Holy Blood and the
Holy Grail concluded that The Protocols was the most persuasive piece of
evidence for the existence and activities of the Priory of Sion. They
speculated that this secret society was working behind the scenes to establish
a theocratic "United States of
Europe". Politically and religiously unified through the imperial cult
of a Merovingian Great Monarch—supposedly descended from a Jesus bloodline—who
occupies both the throne of Europe and the Holy See, this "Holy European Empire" would become the hyperpower of the
21st century. Although the Priory of Sion itself has been exhaustively debunked
by journalists and scholars as a hoax, some apocalyptic millenarian Christian
eschatologists who believe The Protocols is authentic became convinced that the
Priory of Sion was a fulfillment of prophecies found in the Book of Revelation
and further proof of an anti-Christian conspiracy of epic proportions signaling
the imminence of a New World Order.
Skeptics argue that the current gambit of contemporary
conspiracy theorists that use The Protocols is to claim that they
"really" come from some group other than the Jews, such as fallen
angels or alien invaders. Although it is hard to determine whether the conspiracy-minded
actually believe this or are simply trying to sanitize a discredited text,
skeptics argue that it does not make much difference, since they leave the
actual, anti-Semitic text unchanged. The result is to give The Protocols
credibility and circulation.
Round Table
During the second half of Britain's "imperial
century" between 1815 and 1914, English-born South African businessman,
mining magnate, and politician Cecil Rhodes advocated the British Empire
reannexing the United States of America and reforming itself into an "Imperial Federation" to bring
about a hyperpower and lasting world peace. In his first will, written in 1877
at the age of 23, he expressed his wish to fund a secret society (known as the
Society of the Elect) that would advance this goal:
To and for the
establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and
object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world,
the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonization
by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable
by energy, labour and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British
settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the
Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia [Crete], the whole of South
America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain,
the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the
ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the
British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the
Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of
the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars
impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.
In 1890, thirteen years after "his now-famous will," Rhodes elaborated on the same
idea: the establishment of "England
everywhere," which would "ultimately
lead to the cessation of all wars, and one language throughout the world."
"The only thing feasible to carry out this idea is a secret society
gradually absorbing the wealth of the world ["and human minds of the
higher-order"] to be devoted to such an object."
Rhodes also concentrated on the Rhodes Scholarship, which
had British statesman Alfred Milner as one of its trustees. Established in
1902, the original goal of the trust fund was to foster peace among the great
powers by creating a sense of fraternity and a shared worldview among future
British, American, and German leaders by having enabled them to study for free at
the University of Oxford.
Milner and British official Lionel George Curtis were the
architects of the Round Table movement, a network of organizations promoting
closer union between Britain and its self-governing colonies. To this end,
Curtis founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs in June 1919 and,
with his 1938 book The Commonwealth of God, began advocating for the creation
of an imperial federation that eventually reannexes the U.S., which would be
presented to Protestant churches as being the work of the Christian God to
elicit their support. The Commonwealth of Nations was created in 1949, but it
would only be a free association of independent states rather than the powerful
imperial federation imagined by Rhodes, Milner, and Curtis.
The Council on Foreign Relations began in 1917 with a group
of New York academics who were asked by President Woodrow Wilson to offer
options for the foreign policy of the United States in the interwar period.
Originally envisioned as a group of American and British scholars and
diplomats, some of whom belonging to the Round Table movement, it was a
subsequent group of 108 New York financiers, manufacturers, and international
lawyers organized in June 1918 by Nobel Peace Prize recipient and U.S.
secretary of state Elihu Root, that became the Council on Foreign Relations on
29 July 1921. The first of the council's projects was a quarterly journal
launched in September 1922, called Foreign Affairs. The Trilateral Commission
was founded in July 1973, at the initiative of American banker David
Rockefeller, who was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time.
It is a private organization established to foster closer cooperation among the
United States, Europe, and Japan. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as a
counterpart to the Council on Foreign Relations.
In the 1960s, right-wing populist individuals and groups
with a paleoconservative worldview, such as members of the John Birch Society,
were the first to combine and spread a business nationalist critique of
corporate internationalists networked through think tanks such as the Council
on Foreign Relations with a grand conspiracy theory casting them as front
organizations for the Round Table of the "Anglo-American
Establishment", which are financed by an "international banking
cabal" that has supposedly been plotting from the late 19th century on to
impose an oligarchic new world order through a global financial system.
Anti-globalist conspiracy theorists therefore fear that international bankers
are planning to eventually subvert the independence of the U.S. by
subordinating national sovereignty to a strengthened Bank for International
Settlements.
The research findings of historian Carroll Quigley, author
of the 1966 book Tragedy and Hope, are taken by both conspiracy theorists of
the American Old Right (W. Cleon Skousen) and New Left (Carl Oglesby) to
substantiate this view, even though Quigley argued that the Establishment is
not involved in a plot to implement a one-world government but rather British
and American benevolent imperialism driven by the mutual interests of economic
elites in the United Kingdom and the United States. Quigley also argued that,
although the Round Table still exists today, its position in influencing the
policies of world leaders has been much reduced from its heyday during World
War I and slowly waned after the end of World War II and the Suez Crisis. Today
the Round Table is largely a ginger group, designed to consider and gradually
influence the policies of the Commonwealth of Nations, but faces strong
opposition. Furthermore, in American society after 1965, the problem, according
to Quigley, was that no elite was in charge and acting responsibly.
Larry McDonald, the second president of the John Birch
Society and a conservative Democratic member of the United States House of
Representatives who represented the 7th congressional district of Georgia,
wrote a foreword for Allen's 1976 book The Rockefeller File, wherein he claimed
that the Rockefellers and their allies were driven by a desire to create a
one-world government that combined "super-capitalism"
with communism and would be fully under their control. He saw a conspiracy plot
that was "international in scope,
generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."
In his 2002 autobiography Memoirs, David Rockefeller wrote:
For more than a
century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have
seized upon well-publicized incidents ... to attack the Rockefeller family for
the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and
economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working
against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and
me as 'internationalists' and conspiring with others around the world to build
a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world if you
will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
Barkun argues that this statement is partly facetious (the
claim of "conspiracy" and "treason") and partly
serious—the desire to encourage trilateral cooperation among the U.S., Europe,
and Japan;[citation needed] for example — an ideal that used to be a hallmark
of the internationalist wing of the Republican Party (known as "Rockefeller Republicans" in
honor of Nelson Rockefeller) when there was an internationalist wing. The statement, however, is taken at face value and widely cited by
conspiracy theorists as proof that the Council on Foreign Relations uses its
role as the brain trust of American presidents, senators and representatives to
manipulate them into supporting a New World Order in the form of a one-world
government.
In a 13 November 2007 interview with Canadian journalist
Benjamin Fulford, Rockefeller countered that he felt no need for a world
government and wished for the world's governments to work together and
collaborate. He also stated that it seemed neither likely nor desirable to have
only one elected government rule worldwide. He criticized accusations of him
being "ruler of the world"
as nonsensical.
Some American social critics, such as Laurence H. Shoup,
argue that the Council on Foreign Relations is an "imperial brain trust" that has, for decades, played a
central behind-the-scenes role in shaping U.S. foreign policy choices for the
post-World War II international order and the Cold War by determining what
options show up on the agenda and what options do not even make it to the
table; others, such as G. William Domhoff, argue that it is in fact a mere
policy discussion forum which provides the business input to U.S. foreign policy
planning. Domhoff argues that "[i]t
has nearly 3,000 members, far too many for secret plans to be kept within the
group. All the council does is sponsor discussion groups, debates, and
speakers. As far as being secretive, it issues annual reports and allows access
to its historical archives." However, all these critics agree that "[h]istorical studies of the CFR show
that it has a very different role in the overall power structure than what is
claimed by conspiracy theorists."
No comments:
Post a Comment