Caylee Marie Anthony
(August 9, 2005 – 2008) was an American girl who lived in Orlando, Florida,
with her mother, Casey Marie Anthony
(born March 19, 1986), and her maternal grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony. On July 15, 2008, she was reported
missing in a 9-1-1 call made by Cindy, who said she had not seen Caylee for 31
days and that Casey's car smelled like a dead body had been inside it. Cindy
said Casey had given varied explanations as to Caylee's whereabouts before
finally telling her that she had not seen Caylee for weeks. Casey lied to detectives, telling them Caylee
had been kidnapped by a nanny on June 9, and that she had been trying to find
her, too frightened to alert the authorities.
She was charged with first-degree murder in October 2008 and pleaded not
guilty.
On December 11, 2008, two-year-old Caylee's skeletal remains
were found with a blanket inside a trash bag in a wooded area near the Anthony
family's house. Investigative reports
and trial testimony varied between duct tape being found near the front of the
skull and on the mouth of the skull. The
medical examiner mentioned duct tape as one reason she ruled the death a
homicide, but officially listed it as "death
by undetermined means".
The trial lasted six weeks, from May to July 2011. The
prosecution sought the death penalty and alleged Casey wished to free herself
from parental responsibilities and murdered her daughter by administering
chloroform and applying duct tape. The defense team, led by Jose Baez,
countered that the child had drowned accidentally in the family's swimming pool
on June 16, 2008, and that George Anthony disposed of the body. The defense
contended that Casey lied about this and other issues because of a
dysfunctional upbringing, which they said included sexual abuse by her father.
The defense did not present evidence as to how Caylee died, nor evidence that
Casey was sexually abused as a child, but challenged every piece of the
prosecution's evidence, calling much of it "fantasy forensics". Casey did not testify. On July 5, 2011, the
jury found Casey not guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated child abuse, and
aggravated manslaughter of a child, but guilty of four misdemeanor counts of
providing false information to a law enforcement officer. With credit for time served, she was released
on July 17, 2011. A Florida appeals court overturned two of the misdemeanor
convictions on January 25, 2013.
The not-guilty murder verdict was greeted with public
outrage and was both attacked and defended by media and legal commentators.
Some complained that the jury misunderstood the meaning of reasonable doubt,
while others said the prosecution relied too heavily on the defendant's
allegedly poor moral character because they had been unable to show
conclusively how the victim had died.
Time magazine described the case as "the
social media trial of the century".
Disappearance
According to Casey
Anthony's father, George Anthony,
Casey left the family's home on June 16, 2008, taking her daughter Caylee (who
was almost three years old) with her, and did not return for 31 days. Casey's mother Cindy asked repeatedly during
the month to see Caylee, but Casey claimed that she was too busy with a work
assignment in Tampa, Florida. At other times, she said Caylee was with a nanny,
who Casey identified by the name of Zenaida
"Zanny" Fernandez-Gonzalez, or at theme parks or the beach. It was eventually determined that a woman
named Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez did
in fact exist, but that she had never met Casey, Caylee, any other member of
the Anthony family, nor any of Casey's friends.
On July 13, 2008, while doing yard work, Cindy and George Anthony found a notice
from the post office for a certified letter affixed on their front door. George
picked up the certified letter from the post office on July 15, 2008, and found
that his daughter's car was in a tow yard.
When George picked up the car, both he and the tow yard attendant noted
a strong smell coming from the trunk. Both later stated that they believed the
odor to be that of a decomposing body.
When the trunk was opened, it contained a bag of trash, but no human
remains.
Cindy reported Caylee missing that day, July 15, to the Orange County Sheriff's Office. During the same telephone call, Casey
confirmed to the 9-1-1 operator that Caylee had been missing for 31 days.
Sounding distraught, Cindy said: "There
is something wrong. I found my daughter's car today and it smells like there's
been a dead body in the damn car."
Case
Investigation
When Detective Yuri
Melich of the Orange County
Sheriff's Department began investigating Caylee's disappearance, he found
discrepancies in Casey's signed statement. When questioned, Casey said Caylee had been
kidnapped by Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez,
who she also identified as "Zanny",
Caylee's nanny. Although Casey had talked about her, Zanny had never been seen
by Casey's family or friends, and in fact there was no nanny. Casey also told police that she was working at
Universal Studios, a lie she had
been telling her parents for years. Investigators brought Casey to Universal Studios on July 16, 2008; the
day after Caylee was reported missing, and asked her to show them her office.
Casey led police around for a while before admitting that she had been fired
years before.
Casey was first arrested on July 16, 2008, and was charged
the following day with giving false statements to law enforcement, child
neglect, and obstruction of a criminal investigation. The judge denied bail,
saying Casey had shown "woeful
disregard for the welfare of her child". On July 22, 2008, after a bond hearing, the
judge set bail at $500,000. On August
21, 2008, after one month of incarceration, she was released from the Orange County jail after her $500,000
bond was posted by the nephew of California
bail bondsman Leonard Padilla in hopes that she would cooperate and Caylee
would be found.
On August 11, 12, and 13, 2008, meter reader Roy Kronk
called police about a suspicious object found in a forested area near the
Anthony residence. In the first
instance, he was directed by the sheriff's office to call the tip line, which
he did, receiving no return call. On the second instance, he again called the
sheriff's office, eventually was met by two police officers and reported to
them that he had seen what appeared to be a skull near a gray bag. On that occasion, the officer conducted a
short search and stated he did not see anything. On December 11, 2008, Kronk
again called the police. They searched and found the remains of a child in a
trash bag. Investigative teams recovered
duct tape which was hanging from hair attached to the skull and some tissue
left on the skull. Over the next four
days, more bones were found in the wooded area near the spot where the remains
initially had been discovered. On
December 19, 2008, medical examiner Jan
Garavaglia confirmed that the remains found were those of Caylee Anthony. The death was ruled a
homicide and the cause of death listed as undetermined.
Arrests and charges
Casey was offered a limited immunity deal on July 29, 2008,
by prosecutors related to "the false
statements given to law enforcement about locating her child", which
was renewed on August 25, to expire August 28.
She did not take it.
On September 5, 2008, she was released again on bail on all
pending charges after being fitted with an electronic tracking device. Her $500,000 bond was posted by her parents, Cindy and George Anthony, who signed a
promissory note for the bond.
On October 14, 2008, Casey
Anthony was indicted by a grand jury on charges of first degree murder, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of
a child, and four counts of providing false information to police. She was
later arrested. Judge John Jordan ordered that she be held without bond. On October 21, 2008, the charges of child
neglect were dropped against Casey, according to the State Attorney's Office because "[as]
the evidence proved that the child was deceased, the State sought an indictment
on the legally appropriate charges." On October 28, Anthony was arraigned and
pleaded not guilty to all charges.
On April 13, 2009, prosecutors announced that they planned
to seek the death penalty in the case.
Trial
Evidence
Four hundred pieces of evidence were presented. A strand of hair was recovered from the trunk
of Casey's car which was microscopically similar to hair taken from Caylee's
hairbrush. The strand showed
"root-banding," in which hair roots form a dark band after death,
which was consistent with hair from a dead body.
Kronk, who discoverered the remains, repeated the same basic
story that he had told police. On Friday, October 24, 2008, a forensic report
by Arpad Vass of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory judged
that results from an air sampling procedure (called LIBS) performed in the trunk of Casey Anthony's car showed chemical
compounds "consistent with a
decompositional event" based on the presence of five key chemical
compounds out of over 400 possible chemical compounds that Vass' research group
considers typical of decomposition. Investigators stated that the trunk smelled
strongly of human decomposition, but human decomposition was not specified on
the laboratory scale. The process has not been affirmed by a Daubert Test in the courts. Vass' group also stated there was chloroform
in the car trunk.
In October 2009, officials released 700 pages of documents
related to the Anthony investigation, including records of Google searches of
the terms "neck breaking" and "how
to make chloroform" on a computer accessible to Casey, presented by
the prosecutors as evidence of a crime.
According to detectives, crime-scene evidence included
residue of a heart-shaped sticker found on duct tape over the mouth of Caylee's
skull. However, the laboratory was not
able to capture a heart-shape photographically after some duct tape was
subjected to dye testing. A blanket
found at the crime scene matched Caylee's bedding at her grandparents' home.
Among photos entered into evidence was one from the computer
of Ricardo Morales, an ex-boyfriend of Casey Anthony, depicting
a poster with the caption "Win her over
with Chloroform".
Witness John Dennis
Bradley's software, developed for computer investigations, was used by the
prosecution to indicate that Casey had conducted extensive computer searches on
the word "chloroform" 84
times, and to suggest that Anthony had planned to commit murder. He later
discovered that a flaw in the software misread the forensic data and that the
word "chloroform" had been
searched for only one time and the website in question offered information on
the use of chloroform in the 19th century.
Attorneys and jury
The lead prosecutor in the case was Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick. Assistant State Attorneys Frank George and Jeff Ashton completed
the prosecution team. Lead counsel for the defense was Jose Baez, a Florida criminal defense attorney. Attorneys J. Cheney Mason, Dorothy Clay Sims, and Ann Finnell served
as co-counsel. During the trial, attorney Mark Lippman represented George and Cindy Anthony.
Jury selection began on May 9, 2011, at the Pinellas County Criminal Justice Center
in Clearwater, Florida, because the
case had been so widely reported in the Orlando area. Jurors were brought from Pinellas County to Orlando. Jury selection
took longer than expected and ended on May 20, 2011, with twelve jurors and five
alternates being sworn in. The panel
consisted of nine women and eight men. The trial took six weeks, during which
time the jury was sequestered to avoid influence from information available
outside the courtroom.
Opening statements
The trial began on May 24, 2011, at the Orange County Courthouse, with Judge
Belvin Perry presiding. In the opening statements, lead prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick described the story of the
disappearance of Caylee Anthony
day-by-day. The prosecution alleged an intentional murder and sought the death
penalty against Casey Anthony. Prosecutors stated that Anthony used
chloroform to render her daughter unconscious before putting duct tape over her
nose and mouth to suffocate her, and left Caylee's body in the trunk of her car
for a few days before disposing of it. They characterized Anthony as a party girl who killed her daughter to free
herself from parental responsibility and enjoy her personal life.
The defense, led by Jose Baez, claimed in opening statements
that Caylee drowned accidentally in the
family's pool on June 16, 2008, and was found by George Anthony, who told Casey she would spend the rest of her life
in jail for child neglect and then proceeded to cover up Caylee's death. Baez
argued this is why Casey Anthony
went on with her life and failed to report the incident for 31 days. He alleged
that it was the habit of a lifetime for Casey to hide her pain and pretend
nothing was wrong because she had been sexually abused by George Anthony since she was eight years old and her brother Lee
also had made advances toward her. Baez
also questioned whether Roy Kronk,
the meter reader who found the bones, had actually removed them from another
location, and further alleged that the police department's investigation was
compromised by their desire to feed a media frenzy about a child's murder,
rather than a more mundane drowning. He
admitted that Casey had lied about there
being a nanny named Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzales.
Witness testimony
Prosecutors called George
Anthony as their first witness and, in a response to their question, he
denied having sexually abused his daughter Casey. Anthony testified he did not smell anything
resembling human decomposition in Casey's car when she visited him on June 24,
but he did smell something similar to human decomposition when he picked the
car up on July 15. Cindy Anthony
testified that her comment to 9-1-1 that Casey's car smelled "like someone died" was just a "figure of
speech".
Baez asked an FBI analyst about the paternity test the FBI
conducted to see if Lee was Caylee's father. She told the jury the test had
come back negative. Regarding a photo on
the computer of Ricardo Morales, an ex-boyfriend of Casey
Anthony, depicting a poster with the caption "Win her over with Chloroform," Morales said that the
photo was on his Myspace page and
that he had never discussed chloroform with Anthony or searched for chloroform
on her computer.
The prosecution called John
Dennis Bradley, a former Canadian law enforcement officer who develops
software for computer investigations, to analyze a data file from a desktop taken
from the Anthony home. Bradley said he
was able to use a program to recover deleted searches from March 17 and March
21, 2008, and that someone searched the website Sci-spot.com for "chloroform"
84 times. Bradley expressed his belief that "some
of these items might have been bookmarked". Under cross-examination by
the defense, Bradley agreed there were two individual accounts on the desktop
and that there was no way to know who actually performed the searches.
K9 handler Jason
Forgey testified that Gerus, a German Shepherd cadaver dog certified
in 2005, indicated a high alert of human decomposition in the trunk of Casey's
car, saying the police dog has had real-world searches numbering "over three thousand by now".
During cross-examination, Baez argued that the dog's search records were "hearsay". Sgt.
Kristin Brewer also testified that her K9
partner, Bones, signaled decomposition in the backyard during a search in
July 2008. However, neither K9 partner was able to detect decomposition during
a second visit to the Anthony home. Brewer explained that this was because
whatever had been in the yard was either moved or the odor dissipated.
The prosecution called chief
medical examiner Jan Garavaglia, who testified that she determined Caylee's
manner of death to be homicide, but listed it as "death by undetermined means". Garavaglia took into
account the physical evidence present on the remains she examined, as well as
all the available information on the way they were found and what she had been
told by the authorities, before arriving at her determination. "We know by our observations that it's
a red flag when a child has not been reported to authorities with injury,
there's foul play," Garavaglia said. " ... There is no child that should have duct tape on [the lower
part of] its face when it dies." Additionally, Garavaglia addressed
the chloroform evidence found by investigators inside the trunk of Casey's car,
testifying that even a small amount of chloroform would be sufficient to cause
the death of a child.
University of Florida
professor and human identification laboratory director Michael Warren was
brought on by the prosecution to present a computer animation of the way duct
tape could have been used in the death of the child, which the defense objected
to hearing. Judge Perry, after a short recess to review, ruled that the video
could be shown to the jury. The animation featured a picture of Caylee taken
alongside Casey, superimposed with an image of Caylee's decomposed skull, and
another with a strip of duct tape that was recovered with her remains. The
images were slowly brought together showing that the duct tape could have
covered her nose and mouth. Baez stated, "This
disgusting superimposition is nothing more than a fantasy ...They're throwing
things against the wall and seeing if it sticks." Jurors were seen
taking notes of the imagery, and Warren testified that it was his opinion that
the duct tape found with Caylee's skull was placed there before her body began
decomposing.
FBI latent-print
examiner Elizabeth Fontaine testified that adhesive in the shape of a heart
was found on a corner of a piece of duct tape that was covering the mouth
portion of Caylee's remains during ultraviolet testing. Fontaine examined three
pieces of duct tape found on Caylee's remains for fingerprints, and said she
did not find fingerprints but did not expect to, given the months the tape and
the remains had been outdoors and exposed to the elements, stressing that any
oil or sweat from a person's fingertips would have long since deteriorated.
Although Fontaine showed the findings to her supervisor, she did not initially
try to photograph the heart-shaped adhesive, explaining, "When I observe something is unexpected, I note it and continue
with my examination." During the defense's cross-examination, Fontaine
explained that when she examined the sticker evidence a second time, after
subjecting the tape to dye testing, "It
was no longer visible." She said
that other FBI agents had tested the duct tape in the interim.
The defense called two government witnesses who countered
prosecution witness testimony about the duct tape. The chief investigator for
the medical examiner stated that the original placement of the duct tape was
unclear and it could have shifted positions as he collected the remains. Cindy
Anthony testified that their family buried their pets in blankets and
plastic bags, using duct tape to seal the opening. Additionally, an FBI forensic document
examiner found no evidence of a sticker or sticker residue on the duct tape
found near the child's remains.
The defense called forensic
pathologist Dr. Werner Spitz, who performed a second autopsy on Caylee
after Garavaglia and challenged Garavaglia's autopsy report. He called her
autopsy "shoddy," saying it
was a failure that Caylee's skull was not opened during her examination. "You need to examine the whole body in
an autopsy," he said. Spitz stated that he was not allowed to attend
Garavaglia's initial autopsy on Caylee's remains, and that, from his own
follow-up autopsy, he was not comfortable ruling the child's death a homicide.
He said he could not determine what Caylee's manner of death was, but said that
there was no indication to him that she was murdered. Additionally, Spitz
testified that he believed the duct tape found on Caylee's skull was placed
there after the body decomposed, opining that if tape was placed on the skin,
there should have been DNA left on it, and suggested that someone may have
staged some of the crime scene photos.
"The person who took this picture, the person who prepared this, put the
hair there," stated Spitz. When asked by Ashton during
cross-examination, "So your
testimony is the medical examiner's personnel took the hair that wasn't on the
skull, placed it there?", Spitz answered, "It wouldn't be the first time, sir. I can tell you some horror
stories about that."
On June 21, Bradley discovered that a flaw in his software
misread the forensic data and that the word "chloroform"
had been searched for only one time and the website in question offered
information on the use of chloroform in the 19th century. On June 23, Baez called Cindy Anthony to the stand, who told jurors she had been the one
who performed the "chloroform"
search on the family computer in March 2008. The prosecution alleged that only
Casey could have conducted this search and the others because she was the only
one home at the time. When asked by prosecutors how she could have made the
Internet searches when employment records show she was at work, Cindy Anthony said despite what her
work time sheet indicates, she was at home during these time periods because
she left from work early during the days in question. Bradley alerted prosecutor Linda Burdick and Sgt.
Kevin Stenger of the Sheriff's
Office the weekend of June 25 about the discrepancy in his software, and
volunteered to fly to Orlando at his own expense to show them. On the
same day, the judge temporarily halted proceedings when the defense filed a
motion to determine if Anthony was competent to proceed with trial. The motion
states the defense received a privileged communication from their client which
caused them to believe "...Ms.
Anthony is not competent to aid and assist in her own defense". The
trial resumed on June 27 when the judge announced that the results of the
psychological evaluations showed Anthony was competent to proceed. Later, in
testimony about air samples, Dr. Ken
Furton, a professor of chemistry at
Florida International University, stated that there is no consensus in the
field on what chemicals are typical of human decomposition. Judge Perry ruled that the jury would not get
to smell air samples taken from the trunk.
The prosecution stated they discussed Bradley's software
discrepancy with Baez on June 27, and he raised the issue in court
testimony. Baez also asked Judge Perry to instruct the
jury about this search information, but prosecutors disputed this and it was
not done. Also on June 27, the defense called two
private investigators who, in November 2008, had searched the area where the
body was later found. The search was videotaped, but nothing was found. On
June 28, the defense called a Texas
EquuSearch team leader who did two searches of the area and found no body. The defense then called Roy Kronk, who recounted the same basic story he told police about
his discovery of Caylee Anthony's
remains in December 2008. He
acknowledged receiving $5,000 after the remains were identified, but denied
that he told his son that finding the body would make him rich and famous. The
next day, his son testified he had made such statements.
On June 30, the defense called Krystal Holloway, a volunteer
in the search for Caylee, who stated that she had had an affair with George Anthony, that he had been to her
home, and that he had texted her, "Just
thinking about you. I need you in my life." She told the defense that George Anthony had told her that
Caylee's death was "an accident that
snowballed out of control." Under cross-examination by prosecutors,
they pointed to her sworn police statement in which she had said that George Anthony believed it was an
accident, rather than knowing that it was. In her initial report, Holloway
reported George Anthony saying, "I really believe that it was an
accident that just went wrong and (Casey Anthony) tried to cover it up."
She said he had not told her he was present when the alleged accident occurred.
During redirect examination, Baez asked
Holloway if George Anthony had told
her that Caylee was dead while stating publicly that she was missing, to which
she replied yes.
In his earlier testimony, George Anthony denied the affair with Holloway and said he visited
her only because she was ill. He said he
sent the text message because he needed everyone who had helped in his life. After Holloway's testimony, Judge Perry told
jurors that it could be used to impeach George
Anthony's credibility, but that it
was not proof of how Caylee died and/or evidence of Casey Anthony's guilt or innocence.
The prosecution rested its case on June 15, after calling 59
witnesses for 70 different testimonies. The defense rested its case on June 30,
after calling 47 witnesses for 63 different testimonies. Casey
Anthony did not testify.
On June 30 and July 1, the prosecutor presented rebuttal
arguments, beginning by showing the jury photographs of Caylee's clothes and
George's suicide note. It called two
representatives of Cindy Anthony's
former employer who explained why their computer login system shows Cindy was
at work the afternoon she said she went home early and searched her computer
for information about chloroform. A police computer analyst testified someone
had purposely searched online for "neck
+ breaking." Another analyst testified she did not find evidence that Cindy Anthony had searched certain
terms she claimed to have searched. Anthropology
professor Dr. Michael Warren from the University
of Florida was recalled to rebut a defense witness on the need to open a
skull during an autopsy. The lead detective stated that there were no phone
calls between Cindy and George Anthony
during the week of June 16, 2008. However, he told the defense he did not know
that George had a second cell phone.
Closing arguments
Closing arguments were heard July 3 and July 4. Jeff
Ashton, for the prosecution,
told the jury, "When you have a
child, that child becomes your life. This case is about the clash between that
responsibility, and the expectations that go with it and the life that Casey Anthony wanted to have." He outlined the state's case against
Casey, touching on her many lies to her parents and others, the smell in her
car's trunk—identified by several witnesses, including her own father, as the
odor from human decomposition—and the items found with Caylee's skeletal
remains in December 2008. He emphasized how Casey "maintains her lies until they absolutely cannot be maintained any
more" and then replaces [them] with another lie, using "Zanny the Nanny" as an
example. Anthony repeatedly told police that Caylee was with the nanny that she
specifically identified as Zenaida
Fernandez-Gonzalez. Police, however, were never able to find the nanny.
Authorities did find a woman named Zenaida
Fernandez-Gonzalez, but she denied ever meeting the Anthonys.
Ashton reintroduced the items found with Caylee's remains,
including a Winnie the Pooh blanket
that matched the bedding at her grandparents' home, one of a set of laundry
bags with the twin bag found at the Anthony home, and duct tape he said was a
relatively rare brand. "That bag is
Caylee's coffin," Ashton said, holding up a photograph of the laundry
bag, as Casey reacted with emotion. He further criticized the defense's theory
that Caylee drowned in the Anthony pool and that Casey and George panicked upon
finding the child's body and covered up her death. He advised jurors to use
their common sense when deciding on a verdict. "No one makes an accident look like murder," he said.
Before closing arguments, Judge Perry ruled that the defense
could argue that a drowning occurred due to reasonable conclusions aided by
witness testimony, but that arguing sexual abuse was not allowed since there
was nothing to support the claim that George sexually abused Casey. Baez began by contending that there were holes
in the prosecution's forensic evidence, saying it was based on a "fantasy". He told the jury
that the prosecution wanted them to see stains and insects that did not really
exist, that they had not proven that the stains in Anthony's car trunk were
caused by Caylee's decomposing body, rather than from a trash bag found there.
He added that the prosecutors tried to make his client look like a promiscuous
liar because their evidence was weak. He
said the drowning is "the only
explanation that makes sense" and showed jurors a photograph of Caylee
opening the home's sliding glass door by herself. He stressed that there were
no child safety locks in the home and that both of Casey's parents, George and
Cindy, testified that Caylee could get out of the house easily. Although Cindy testified
that Caylee could not put the ladder on the side of the pool and climb up, Baez
alleged that Cindy may have left the ladder up the night before. "She didn't admit to doing so in
testimony," he said, "but
how much guilt would she have knowing it was her that left the ladder up that
day?"
Defense attorney Jose
Baez told jurors his biggest fear was that they would base their verdict on
emotions, not evidence. "The
strategy behind that is, if you hate her, if you think she's a lying, no-good
slut, then you'll start to look at this evidence in a different light,"
he said. "I told you at the very
beginning of this case that this was an accident that snowballed out of
control... What made it unique is not what happened, but who it happened
to." He explained Casey Anthony's
behavior as being the result of her dysfunctional family situation. At one
point as Baez spoke, Ashton could be seen smiling or chuckling behind his hand.
This prompted Baez to refer to him as "this
laughing guy right here". The judge called a sidebar conference, then
a recess. When court resumed, he chastised both sides, saying both Ashton and
Baez had violated his order that neither side should make disparaging remarks
about opposing counsel. After both attorneys apologized, the judge accepted the
apologies but warned that a recurrence would have the offending attorney
excluded from the courtroom.
Defense attorney
Cheney Mason then followed with an additional closing argument. Addressing
the jury to discuss the charges against Casey
Anthony. "The burden rests on
the shoulders of my colleagues at the state attorney's office," Mason
said, referring to proving that Casey
Anthony committed a crime. Mason said that the jurors are required;
whether they like it or not, to find the defendant not guilty if the state did
not adequately prove its case against Casey
Anthony. Mason emphasized that the burden of proof is
on the state, and that Casey Anthony's
decision not to testify is not an implication of guilt.
Lead prosecutor Linda
Drane Burdick in the prosecution rebuttal told the jurors that she and her
colleagues backed up every claim they made in their opening statement six weeks
ago, and implied that the defense never directly backed up their own
opening-statement claims. "My biggest fear is that common sense
will be lost in all the rhetoric of the case," she said, insisting
that she would never ask the jury to make their decision based on emotion but
rather the evidence. "Responses to guilt are oh, so
predictable," she stated. "What
do guilty people do? They lie, they avoid, they run, they mislead... they
divert attention away from themselves and they act like nothing is wrong."
She suggested that the garbage bag in the trunk of the car was a "decoy" put there to keep
people from getting suspicious about the smell of the car when she left it
abandoned in a parking stall directly beside a dumpster in an Amscot parking lot. "Whose life was better without
Caylee?" she asked, stressing how George
and Cindy Anthony were wondering where their daughter and granddaughter
were in June and July 2008, the same time Casey was staying at her boyfriend's
apartment while Caylee's body was decomposing in the woods. "That's the only question you need to
answer in considering why Caylee Marie
Anthony was left on the side of the road dead." Burdick then
showed the jury a split-screen with a photo of Casey partying at a night club
on one side and a close-up of the "Bella
Vita" (meaning "Beautiful
Life") tattoo that she got weeks after Caylee died on the other.
The jury began deliberations on July 4. On July 5, prosecutors stated that, during
deliberations, they were about to give the jury the corrected information with
regard to Bradley's software discrepancy; however, the jury reached a verdict
before they could do so. One legal analyst stated that if the jury had found
Casey guilty before receiving the exculpatory evidence, the prosecution's
failure to fully disclose it could have been grounds for a mistrial.
No comments:
Post a Comment