Aspects
Ethical
arguments
Torture has been criticized on
humanitarian and moral grounds, on the grounds that evidence extracted by
torture is unreliable, and because torture corrupts institutions that tolerate
it. Besides degrading the victim,
torture debases the torturer: American advisors alarmed at torture by their
South Vietnamese allies early in the Vietnam War concluded that "if a
commander allowed his officers and men to fall in to these vices [they] would
pursue them for their own sake, for the perverse pleasure they drew from
them." The consequent degeneracy
destroyed discipline and morale: "[a] soldier had to learn that he existed
to uphold law and order, not to undermine it."
Organizations like Amnesty
International argue that the universal legal prohibition is based on a
universal philosophical consensus that torture and ill-treatment are repugnant,
abhorrent, and immoral. But since
shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks there has been a debate in the
United States about whether torture is justified in some circumstances. Some
people, such as Alan M. Dershowitz and Mirko Bagaric, have argued the need for
information outweighs the moral and ethical arguments against torture. However, after coercive practices were banned,
interrogators in Iraq saw an increase of 50 percent more high-value
intelligence. Maj. Gen. Geoffrey D. Miller the American commander in charge of
detentions and interrogations stated "a rapport-based interrogation
that recognizes respect and dignity, and having very well-trained interrogators
is the basis by which you develop intelligence rapidly and increase the
validity of that intelligence." Others including Robert Mueller, FBI Director
since 5 July 2001, have pointed out that despite former Bush Administration
claims that waterboarding has "disrupted a number of attacks, maybe dozens
of attacks", they do not believe that evidence gained by the U.S.
government through what supporters of the techniques call "enhanced
interrogation” has disrupted a single attack and no one has come up with a
documented example of lives saved thanks to these techniques. On 19 June 2009, the US government announced
that it was delaying the scheduled release of declassified portions of a report
by the CIA Inspector General that reportedly cast doubt on the effectiveness of
the "enhanced interrogation" techniques employed by CIA
interrogators, according to references to the report contained in several
Bush-era Justice Department memos declassified in the Spring of 2009 by the US
Justice Department.
The ticking time bomb scenario, a
thought experiment, asks what to do to a captured terrorist who has placed a nuclear
bomb in a populated area. If the terrorist is tortured, he may explain how to
defuse the bomb. The scenario asks if it is ethical to torture the terrorist. A
2006 BBC poll held in 25 nations gauged support for each of the following
positions:
- Terrorists pose such an extreme threat that governments should be allowed to use some degree of torture if it may gain information that saves innocent lives.
- Clear rules against torture should be maintained because any use of torture is immoral and will weaken international human rights.
An average of 59% of people
worldwide rejected torture. However, there was a clear divide between those countries
with strong rejection of torture (such as Italy, where only 14% supported
torture) and nations where rejection was less strong. Often this lessened
rejection is found in countries severely and frequently threatened by terrorist
attacks. E.g., Israel, despite its Supreme Court outlawing torture in 1999,
showed 43% supporting torture, but 48% opposing, India showed 37% supporting
torture and only 23% opposing.
Within nations there is a clear
divide between the positions of members of different ethnic groups, religions,
and political affiliations, sometimes reflecting distinctions between groups
considering themselves threatened or victimized by terror acts and those from
the alleged perpetrator groups. For example, the study found that among Jews in
Israel 53% favored some degree of torture and only 39% wanted strong rules
against torture while Muslims in Israel were overwhelmingly against any use of
torture, unlike Muslims polled elsewhere. Differences in general political
views also can matter. In one 2006 survey by the Scripps Center at Ohio
University, 66% of Americans who identified themselves as strongly Republican
supported torture, compared to 24% of those who identified themselves as
strongly Democratic. In a 2005 U.S.
survey 72% of American Catholics supported the use of torture in some
circumstances compared to 51% of American secularists. A Pew survey in 2009 similarly found that the
religiously unaffiliated are the least likely (40 percent) to support torture,
and that the more a person claims to attend church, the more likely he or she
is to condone torture; among racial/religious groups, white evangelical
Protestants were far and away the most likely (62 percent) to support
inflicting pain as a tool of interrogation.
A Today/Gallup poll "found
that sizable majorities of Americans disagree with tactics ranging from leaving
prisoners naked and chained in uncomfortable positions for hours, to trying to
make a prisoner think he was being drowned".
There are also different attitudes
as to what constitutes torture, as revealed in an ABC News/Washington Post
poll, where more than half of the Americans polled thought that techniques such
as sleep deprivation were not torture.
In practice, so-called
"enhanced interrogation" techniques were employed by the CIA in
situations that did not involve the "ticking time bomb" scenario that
has been the subject of opinion polls and public debate. In April 2009 a former
senior U.S. intelligence official and a former Army psychiatrist stated that the
Bush administration applied pressure on interrogators to use the "enhanced
interrogation" techniques on detainees to find evidence of cooperation
between al Qaida and the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein's regime. The purported link between al Qaeda and
Hussein’s regime, which has been disproven, was a key political justification
for the Iraq War. On 13 May 2009, former NBC News investigative producer Robert
Windrem reported, as confirmed by former Iraq Survey Group leader Charles
Duelfer, which the Vice President's Office suggested that an interrogation team
led by Duelfer waterboard an Iraqi prisoner suspected of knowing about a
relationship between al Qaeda and Saddam.
On 14 February 2010, in an
appearance on ABC’s This Week, Vice-President Dick Cheney reiterated his
support of waterboarding and “enhanced interrogation" techniques for
captured terrorist suspects, saying, "I was and remain a strong proponent
of our enhanced interrogation program."
Pressed by the BBC in 2010 on his
personal view of waterboarding, Presidential Advisor Karl Rove said: "I'm
proud that we kept the world safer than it was, by the use of these techniques.
They’re appropriate; they're in conformity with our international requirements
and with US law."
A 15-month investigation by the
Guardian and BBC Arabic, published on March 2013, disclosed that "the US
sent a veteran of the dirty wars in Central
America to oversee Iraqi commando units involved in acts of torture during the
American-led occupation. These American citizens could theoretically be tried
by the International Criminal Court even though the US is not a signatory. But
it would have to be referred by the UN Security Council and, given that the US
has a veto on the council, this hypothesis is very improbable." Reprieve Legal
Director Kat Craig said: "This latest exposé of human rights abuses shows that
torture is endemic to US foreign policy; these are considered and deliberate
acts, not only sanctioned but developed by the highest echelons of US security
service.
Effectiveness
There is a strong utilitarian argument
against torture; namely, that it is ineffective.
Information supporting the
ineffectiveness of torture goes back centuries. For example, during witch
trials torture was routinely used to try to force subjects to admit their guilt
and to identify other witches. It was found that subjects would make up stories
if it meant the torture would cease.
There is no scientific evidence
supporting its effectiveness.
The lack of scientific basis for the
effectiveness of torture as an interrogation techniques is summarized in a 2006
Intelligence Science Board report titled "EDUCING INFORMATION,
Interrogation: Science and Art, Foundations for the Future".
On the other hand, some have pointed
to some specific cases where torture has elicited true information.
Rejection
A famous example of rejection of the
use of torture was cited by the Argentine National Commission on the
Disappearance of Persons in whose report; Italian general Carlo Alberto Dallo
Chiesa was reputed to have said in connection with the investigation of the
disappearance of Prime Minister Aldo Moro, "Italy can survive the loss of
Aldo Moro. It would not survive the introduction of torture."
Secrecy
Before the emergence of modern
policing, torture was an important aspect of policing and the use of it was
openly sanctioned and acknowledged by the authority. The Economist magazine
proposed that one of the reasons torture endures is that torture does indeed
work in some instances to extract information/confession, if those who are
being tortured are indeed guilty. Depending on the culture, torture has at
times been carried on in silence (official silence semi-silence (known but not
spoken about), or openly acknowledged in public (to instill fear and
obedience).
In the 21st century, even when
states sanction their interrogation methods, torturers often work outside the
law. For this reason, some prefer methods that, while unpleasant, leave victims
alive and unmarked. A victim with no visible damage may lack credibility when
telling tales of torture, whereas a person missing fingernails or eyes can
easily prove claims of torture. Mental torture however can leave scars just as
deep and long-lasting as physical torture. Professional torturers in some countries have
used techniques such as electrical shock, asphyxiation, heat, cold, noise, and
sleep deprivation, which leave little evidence, although in other contexts
torture frequently results in horrific mutilation or death. However the most
common and prevalent form of torture worldwide in both developed and
under-developed countries is beating.
No comments:
Post a Comment