The Affair of the Diamond Necklace (French: Affaire du collier de la Reine, "Affair of the Queen's Necklace") was an incident from 1784 to 1785 at the court of King Louis XVI of France that involved his wife, Queen Marie Antoinette.
The Queen's reputation, already tarnished by gossip, was
further sullied by the false accusation that she had participated in a crime to
defraud the Crown's jewelers in acquiring a very expensive diamond necklace she
then refused to pay for. In reality, she rejected the idea of buying it only to
have her signature forged by Jeanne de Valois-Saint-Rémy. Although Jeanne was
later convicted, the event remains historically significant as one of many that
led to the French disillusionment with the monarchy, in that it was one of the
contemporary scandals that gave moral weight and popular support for the French
Revolution.
Background
In 1772, Louis XV of France decided to make Madame du Barry,
one of his mistresses, a special gift at the estimated cost of 2,000,000 livres
(approximately US$15.1 million in 2021). He requested that Parisian jewelers
Charles Auguste Boehmer and Paul Bassenge create a diamond necklace that would surpass
all others in grandeur.
It took the jewelers several years and a great deal of money
to amass an appropriate set of diamonds. In the meantime, Louis XV died of
smallpox and his grandson and successor banished Madame du Barry from the
court.
It was described as "a
row of seventeen glorious diamonds, as large almost as filberts... a
three-wreathed festoon, and pendants enough (simple pear shaped, multiple
star-shaped, or clustering amorphous) encircle it... around a very Queen of
Diamonds". The jewelers hoped it would be a product that the new Queen
of France, Marie Antoinette, would buy and indeed in 1778 the new king, Louis
XVI, offered it to his wife as a present, but she refused. The queen initially
turned it down stating, "We have
more need of seventy-fours [ships] than of necklaces." Some said that
Marie Antoinette refused the necklace because it was created for du Barry, whom
she strongly disliked. According to others, Louis XVI himself changed his mind.
After having vainly tried to place the necklace outside
France, the jewelers again attempted to sell it to Marie Antoinette after the
birth of Louis Joseph, Dauphin of France, in 1781. The Queen again refused.
Affair
Jeanne de Saint-Rémy
de Valois (Jeanne de la Motte)
A confidence trickster who called herself Jeanne de
Valois-Saint-Rémy, also known as Jeanne de la Motte, made a plan to use the
necklace to gain wealth and possibly power and royal patronage. A descendant of
an out-of-wedlock son of Henry II of France, Jeanne had married an officer of
the gendarmes, Nicholas de la Motte, the self-proclaimed "Comte de la Motte". She was living on a small pension
that had been granted to her by the King.
In March 1785, Jeanne became the mistress of the Cardinal de
Rohan, a former French ambassador to the court of Vienna. The Cardinal was
regarded with displeasure by Queen Marie Antoinette for having spread rumors
about the Queen's behavior to her formidable mother, Holy Roman Empress Maria
Theresa. The Queen had also learned of a letter in which the Cardinal spoke of
Maria Theresa in a manner that the Queen found offensive.
The Cardinal was then trying to regain the Queen's favor to
become one of the King's ministers. Jeanne de la Motte, having entered court
utilizing a lover named Rétaux de Villette, persuaded Rohan that she had been
received by the Queen and enjoyed her favor. On hearing of that, Rohan resolved
to use Jeanne to regain the Queen's goodwill. Jeanne assured the Cardinal that
she was making efforts on his behalf.
Cardinal de Rohan
Thus began an alleged correspondence between Rohan and the
Queen. Jeanne de la Motte returned the replies to Rohan's notes, which she
affirmed came from the Queen. As the tone of the letters became very warm, the
Cardinal, convinced that Marie Antoinette was in love with him, became enamored
of her. He begged Jeanne to arrange a secret night-time interview with the
Queen on his behalf; the supposed meeting took place in August 1784. In the
gardens of the Palace of Versailles, the Cardinal met with a woman whom he
believed to be Marie Antoinette. In fact, the woman was a prostitute, Nicole Le
Guay d'Oliva, whom Jeanne had hired because of her resemblance to the Queen.
Rohan offered her a rose. In her role as the Queen, she promised him that she
would forget their past disagreements.
Jeanne de la Motte took advantage of the Cardinal's belief
in her by borrowing large sums of money from him, telling him that they were
for the Queen's charity work. With that money, Jeanne could make her way into
respectable society. As she openly boasted about her mythical relationship with
the Queen, many assumed that the affair was genuine.
Marie Antoinette,
Queen of France
The jewelers Boehmer and Bassenge resolved to use her to
sell their necklace. She, at first, refused a commission, but then changed her
mind and accepted it. According to Madame Campan, Jeanne, pretending to be the
Queen, sent several letters to the Cardinal, including an order to buy the
necklace. They were signed "Marie
Antoinette de France", but the Cardinal did not know or remember that
French royals signed only with their given names.
On 21 January 1785, Jeanne told the Cardinal that Marie
Antoinette wanted to buy the necklace but, not wishing to purchase such an
expensive item publicly during a time of need, the Queen wanted the Cardinal to
act as a secret intermediary. A little while later, Rohan negotiated the
purchase of the necklace for 2,000,000 livres, to be paid in installments. He
claimed to have the Queen's authorization for the purchase and showed the
jewelers the conditions of the bargain in the Queen's handwriting. Rohan took
the necklace to Jeanne's house, where a man, whom Rohan believed to be a valet
of the Queen, came to fetch it. The diamond necklace "was promptly picked apart, and the gems sold on the black
markets of Paris and London" by Madame de la Motte.
When the time came to pay, Jeanne de la Motte presented the
Cardinal's notes, but they were insufficient. Boehmer complained to the Queen,
who told him that she had neither ordered nor received the necklace. She had
the story of the negotiations repeated for her. Then followed a coup de theater.
Scandal
The controversy of the event stems from the arrest of the
Cardinal in the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles and the trial that declared him
innocent and Jeanne de la Motte Valois and her accomplices guilty.
On 15 August 1785, the feast of the Assumption of Mary,
while the court was awaiting the King and the Queen to go to the chapel, the
Cardinal de Rohan, who was to officiate, was taken before the King, the Queen,
the Minister of the Court Louis Auguste Le Tonnelier de Breteuil and the Keeper
of the Seals Armand Thomas Hue de Miromesnil to explain himself. Rohan produced
a letter signed "Marie Antoinette de
France". Royalty signed with only the baptismal name, but that fact
was missed by Rohan and brought up during his trial and "prejudiced the King against Rohan" as he "breath[ed] royal etiquette since
birth... and could not understand how a courtier, and above all a Rohan, a
member of a family so keen on the details of status, could make such a
mistake".
Rohan was arrested and taken to the Bastille. On the way, he
sent home a note ordering the destruction of his correspondence. Jeanne was not
arrested until three days later, giving her a chance to destroy her papers.
The police arrested the prostitute Nicole Le Guay as well as
Rétaux de Villette, who confessed that he had written the letters given to
Rohan in the queen's name and had imitated her signature. The noted Freemason
and occultist Alessandro Cagliostro was also arrested although it is doubtful
whether he had any part in the affair.
The Cardinal de Rohan accepted the Parlement de Paris as
judges. Pope Pius VI was incensed, since he believed that the cardinal should
be tried by his natural judge (himself). However, his notes remained
unanswered. A sensational trial resulted in the acquittal of the Cardinal, Leguay
and Cagliostro on 31 May 1786. "Rohan's
choice of the Parliament, whatever the verdict, both prolonged matters and took
them into the political arena". Jeanne de La Motte was condemned to
whipping, branding with a V (for voleuse, 'thief')
on each shoulder, and sent to life imprisonment in the prostitutes' prison at
the Salpêtrière. In June the following year, she escaped from prison by being
disguised as a boy. Meanwhile, her husband was tried in absentia and condemned
to be a galley slave. The forger Villette was banished. That made the event
into a matter of public interest, rather than being handled quietly and
privately.
Public opinion was much excited by the trial. The Paris
Parliament did not comment on the alleged actions of the Queen. The trial found
Marie Antoinette blameless in the matter, Rohan an innocent dupe, and that de
La Mottes deceived both for their own ends.
Despite findings to the contrary, many people in France
persisted in the belief that the Queen used the La Mottes as an instrument to
satisfy her hatred of the Cardinal de Rohan. Various circumstances fortified
that belief: the Queen's disappointment at Rohan's acquittal and the fact that
he was afterwards deprived by the King of his charges and exiled to the Abbey
of la Chaise-Dieu. In addition, the people assumed that the Parliament of
Paris's acquittal of Rohan implied that Marie Antoinette had somehow been in
the wrong. All of those factors led to a huge decline in the Queen's popularity
and impressed an image of her to the public as a manipulative spendthrift who
was more interested in vanity than in the welfare of her people.
Jeanne de la Motte took refuge in London, and in 1789, she
published her Mémoires Justificatifs in which she once again libeled Queen
Marie Antoinette.
Significance
Marie Antoinette
depicted as a Beast
The affair of the diamond necklace was important in
discrediting the Bourbon monarchy in the eyes of the French people four years
before the French Revolution. Marie Antoinette became even more unpopular, and
malicious gossip about her made her a greater liability to her husband.
After the affair broke out to the general public there was
an increase in literature defaming the Queen. Her "unpopularity was so great after the Diamond Necklace Affair that
it could no longer be ignored by either the queen or the government. Her
appearances in public all but ceased." As she was associated with the
scandal and already considered by some to be an enemy of the French people, her
reputation was irreversibly destroyed.
Marie Antoinette's reputation never recovered from this
incident. Her early history of excessive spending had already blemished her
popularity, but the Diamond Necklace Affair catapulted public opinion of her
into near-hatred, since she appeared to have plotted to misuse more of the
kingdom's depleting money for personal trinkets.
Marie Antoinette's
Execution on 16 October 1793
The Diamond Necklace Affair heightened the French general
public's hatred and disdain for Marie Antoinette since it was "designed to leave the queen in a state
of scandal, with the impossibility of claiming any truth for herself".
The public relations nightmare led to an increase in salacious and degrading
pamphlets, which would serve as kindling for the oncoming French Revolution. It
could be said that "she symbolized,
among other things, the lavishness and corruption of a dying regime"
and served as "the perfect scapegoat
of the morality play that the revolution in part became", which made
her a target for the hatred of the French Republic and groups like the Jacobins
and the sans-culottes.
She was never able to shake off the idea in public
imagination that she had perpetrated an extravagant fraud for her own frivolous
ends. Nonetheless, the affair prompted Louis XVI to become closer to his wife
and may have inclined him to be more defensive of and more responsive to her
before and during the Revolution.
In fiction
The Great Cophta, by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1791)
Diamond Necklace, by Thomas Carlyle (1837)
The Queen's Necklace, by Alexandre Dumas, père (1848) (ISBN
1-58963-209-5)
"The Queen's
Necklace", by Maurice Leblanc (1905) (An Arsène Lupin Story)
Marie Antoinette, starring Norma Shearer, Tyrone Power, John
Barrymore, and Robert Morley (1938)
The Queen's Necklace, by Antal Szerb (1943)
L'affaire du collier de la reine, a film directed by Marcel
L'Herbier and starring Viviane Romance (1946)
Black Magic, a film starring Orson Welles (1949), an
adaptation of Alexandre Dumas's novel Joseph Balsamo (Mémoires d'un médecin:
Joseph Balsamo, 1846–48) (a.k.a. Memoirs of a Physician, Cagliostro, Madame
Dubarry, The Countess Dubarry, or The Elixir of Life) the first of his Marie
Antoinette romances.
The Queen of Diamonds, by Jean Plaidy (1958)
"IL Diavolo in Giardino", Comedy by Luchino
Visconti, Filippo Sanjust and Enrico Medioli. Music by Franco Mannino (Palermo,
1963)
The Necklace Affair, by Edgar P. Jacobs (part of the Blake
and Mortimer comic series) (1967)
The Rose of Versailles, by Riyoko Ikeda, first published
1973 (manga); anime television series, 1979
Norby and the Queen's Necklace, by Janet Asimov (1986)
Blade of the Guillotine, by Arthur Byron Cover (part of the
Time Machine series) (1986)
The Affair of the Necklace (2001 film)
In the Feddal Castle Series by H.C. Delaval, the second
novel The Fourteenth Lady of Feddal, the necklace is revealed to have been
secreted into a chandelier in the drawing room of Feddal Castle. This is why it
is dubbed The Versailles Chandelier in the series as it was supposedly sent
before the French Revolution by Louis XVI to the then Lord Burdon of Feddal.
Dress-Up! Time Princess, as part of the Queen Marie story
and The Affair of the Necklace mini-story (2017 game)
Stealing the World's Most Expensive Necklace (2020 YouTube
video) by Watcher Entertainment's Shane Madej in the Puppet History Series.
In Ocean's 8, the necklace is one of the several on display
in the fictional Met Gala exhibit.
The Affair of the Necklace is the main story told in the
2023 musical "Cake: The Marie
Antoinette Playlist” by Morgan Lloyd Malcolm, with music and lyrics by
Tasha Taylor Johnson and Jack McManus.
No comments:
Post a Comment