The murder of Zhang
Miao (张妙)
by Yao Jiaxin (药家鑫) was an
intentional homicide case in China. On October 20, 2010, Yao Jiaxin, a 21-year-old music student from Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, ran down and injured a restaurant
waitress, Zhang Miao, while driving,
then got out of his car and stabbed her to death when he saw her memorizing his
license plate number. Yao was put on trial on March 23, 2011, was sentenced to
death on April 22, 2011, and executed on June 7, 2011. This case brought much
public attention because of Yao's family background and whether the death
penalty was improper.
Summary
On the night of October 20, 2010, Yao Jiaxin, a pianist studying at Xi’an Conservatory of Music, hit cafe waitress Zhang Miao with his Chevrolet
Cruze as she was riding her bicycle. When he got out of the car, he found
Zhang trying to memorize his license plate number. As he was afraid that Zhang
would get him in trouble or ask for compensation for this accident, he took
out a knife and stabbed her eight times until she died. When he was trying to
escape, he hit two other people on the road and was eventually apprehended.
However, the police released him because of a lack of evidence. The police did
not manage to properly connect the two accidents and charge him with murder
until October 22.
Yao confessed on October 23 and was put on trial on March
23, 2011, at the Xi’an Intermediate
People's Court. Since he had shown remorse for the murder, it was quite
likely that he would escape the death penalty. However, after this case was
exposed by the media and discussed heatedly on the internet, most netizens
demanded Yao receive the death penalty. Using Human Flesh Search, people were
able to discover that Yao's father was a well-placed military representative in
Xi’an, which added to popular resentment of him.
On the other hand, a crime
psychologist, Li Meijin, made controversial comments on the case in an
interview on China Central Television,
which was also maligned by netizens. She posited that Yao's behavior in
stabbing the woman eight times was related to his miserable experience of
playing piano during his childhood. ‘His
behavior of stabbing the victim eight times could have been a mechanical
repetition of him hitting the piano keys’, said Li. However, she was seen
as an unabashed apologist for Yao. Netizens called her the 'defender of a murderer' and also launched a Human flesh search
engine to discredit her. Many people also thought that the state media coverage
of the case was biased, as it covered only the murderer without any empathy for
the victim.
Discussion
The education system
During the trial, Yao's lawyer pleaded for leniency by
saying Yao was a 'model student',
with many awards for academic excellence.
This was very ironic and led to heated discussion over the
Chinese education system. While most parents only care about children's grades,
they care less about their character and moral compass. Such a rigid education
deprives children of their natural development and makes them indifferent about
life.
Abolition of the death
penalty
There was a heated debate on the internet by many public
figures about whether capital punishment in China should be abolished. The
debate was triggered by the murder case of Yao. According to an online Yahoo
survey about whether Yao should get the death penalty, 96.5% (10,710 out of
11,100) of the respondents said that he should. One of the reasons for the
widespread public outrage towards Yao was that they were afraid that China would
be controlled by jungle law.
Results of trial and
responses
Yao was found guilty by the Xi'an Intermediate People's Court, and sentenced to death on April
22, 2011. He appealed the court's decision to the Shaanxi Provincial Higher People's Court, which rejected his appeal
on May 20. The Supreme People's Court
reviewed the case and upheld the death sentence, concluding that the first and
second trials were without error. 'The motive was extremely despicable, the
measures extremely cruel and the consequences extremely serious,' said the SPC.
Yao was executed on June 7, 2011.
The public reaction towards the execution varied on the
internet. Some claimed that it was a victory for public action over the
privileged class, while others considered Yao a victim of cyberstalking/online
mobs.
No comments:
Post a Comment